Can a race be a good fund-raiser?
A race director told us his event has grown every year and recently fielded a record 136 finishers. He was proud of the huge profit generated by the race - about $1,000.
This race may be the biggest fund-raiser in that community, but it wouldn't pass muster in a lot of other places.
Since race entries don't cover costs, many races lose money all of the time. That's fine for many - the race is really serving as a marketing campaign, usually for a hospital, running store, or other business.
But fund-raising organizations can't afford to lose money - ever. Even a successful event will have to use the majority of its income to pay for overhead. The net profit has to be worth it.
So, how much profit is enough to justify a race as a fund-raiser? $1,000? $5,000? $10,000? $25,000?
It depends on the organization's budget, the number of events it conducts each year, the amount of sponsorship and underwriting it can secure, and its interest in fielding a quality event, among other things.
Races are not good fund-raisers. So why are so many organizations trying to raise money from races?
